MPN Watch

Dossier pubmed observational 13-jul-2026

Mutational profile and cardiovascular risk factors impact prognosis in triple-negative essential thrombocythemia.

Key claim: In triple-negative essential thrombocythemia, pathogenic non-driver mutations (notably ASXL1, CBL, EZH2, and ZRSR2) predict leukemic progression and worse overall survival, while age over 60, prior thrombosis, and cardiovascular risk factors drive thrombotic risk.

Abstract

Triple-negative essential thrombocythemia (TN-ET) represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The aim of the present study was to identify prognostic factors useful for tailoring treatment. 241 TN-ET patients with myeloid panel sequencing and confirmatory bone marrow biopsy were selected. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants were identified in 19.5% of patients. Mutation carriers were older (median age 66 years vs. 53, p < 0.001) and had a higher frequency of prior thrombosis (19.6% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.013). Presence of pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants was associated with leukemic progression (HR 12.608; 95% CI: 2.616-60.775, p = 0.002) and lower overall survival (HR 3.008; 95% CI: 1.43-6.327, p = 0.004). ASXL1 (p = 0.004), CBL (p < 0.001), EZH2 (p < 0.001), and ZRSR2 (p < 0.001) mutations were associated with inferior leukemia-free survival. Age over 60 years, previous thrombosis, and cardiovascular risk factors were associated with higher thrombotic risk. Revised IPSET-thrombosis was useful for risk stratification (10-year probability of overall thrombosis: 30%, 15%, and 6% for high-, intermediate-, and very-low risk patients, respectively, p < 0.001). ARTS score refined arterial thrombosis stratification (10 years probability: 25% and 6% for high- and low-risk, respectively, p < 0.001). Progression to myelofibrosis was a rare event in this cohort (2.5%). These results highlight the biological and prognostic relevance of molecular profile in TN-ET.

Why this matters

Triple-negative ET (~10% of ET) lacks the JAK2/CALR/MPL anchors used for standard risk stratification, leaving prognostication uncertain. This finding shows that classical clinical thrombosis predictors (age >60, prior thrombosis, cardiovascular risk factors, IPSET-thrombosis, ARTS) still apply, while non-driver mutations — particularly ASXL1, CBL, EZH2, and ZRSR2 — carry the leukemic-progression and survival signal, providing an actionable molecular framework for a subset that has been prognostically orphaned.

Source

Link

Briefing card

Mutational profile and cardiovascular risk factors impact prognosis in triple-negative essential thrombocythemia.
Stage: observational · pubmed · 13-jul-2026

If you have triple-negative essential thrombocythemia, non-driver mutations like ASXL1 predict leukemic progression while your thrombosis risk is set mainly by age, prior clots, and cardiovascular risk factors.

In triple-negative essential thrombocythemia, pathogenic non-driver mutations (notably ASXL1, CBL, EZH2, and ZRSR2) predict leukemic progression and worse overall survival, while age over 60, prior thrombosis, and cardiovascular risk factors drive thrombotic risk.

Cross-references (0)

None recorded — doctrine links and citations appear here as scans and citation sweeps find them.

🔎 Pulled in by auto-added search #51 (pubmed): ("cardiovascular risk score"[Title/Abstract] OR "IPSET-thrombosis"[Title/Abstract] OR "thrombotic risk stratification"[Title/Abstract] OR "venous thromboembolism"[Title/Abstract]) AND ("polycythemia vera"[Title/Abstract] OR "essential thrombocythemia"[Title/Abstract] OR "myeloproliferative"[Title/Abstract])

External: doi:10.1038/s41375-026-03035-9

Ask about this finding

Replies are grounded in the abstract and metadata above. The model will quote directly when possible and say so if a question isn't covered.

build build 612 · 69ce4cf-dirty · 2026-11-11